December 9, 2016
As 2016 winds down, you’re all certainly aware of the power of social media. You would probably have to have been on a space ship heading to Mars to be unaware of the phenomenon of Donald Trump: TIME’s “Person of the Year”, and the president-elect of the USA, has achieved so much of his success arguably through his use of Twitter!
Imagine that. Only a few years ago, I recall seeing people still smile at the absurdity of ‘tweeting’, of compressing ideas into a mere 140 characters. And now we have the proverbial ‘leader of the free world’ ascendant at least in part because of his use of social media.
There is no doubt that Twitter, and other social media platforms (such as this blog, or our podcasts), have become major suppliers of information to the media consumer. If not supplanting traditional media, social media is certainly nudging it to the side. This is as true in the worlds of sports, sports medicine, and sports medicine research as it is elsewhere.
In the world of sports medicine research, the ‘impact factor’ has played the defining role as the measuring stick of a journal’s heft for a long time. The metric has had its critics, but its importance has not waned. I for one can vouch for that: when I went ‘up’ from Assistant to Associate Professor last year, part of my application involved demonstration of publication in journals with a worthy impact factor.
At CJSM we just concluded our semi-annual associate editors meeting, bringing together a host of clinicians and researchers from around the world. We are proud of our journal’s impact factor (2.308), but we are also self-critical and are looking for other measures of the journal’s role in the modern world.
Altmetric is one such measure.
Sound familiar? Thinking you have heard about ‘alt-someting’ recently? Read more of this post